The Silent Worldwide Holocaust of Chemo

Cancer is a problem made infinitely worse by the medical establishment.

This article is to encourage the reader to take some serious reflection on a deadly serious issue. With Jade Goodie in the headline now is a good time to air this issue. To start with we'll talk a little about the conventional medicine and its processes.

Principles of Cancer Staging and Diagnosis.

Diagnosis and staging are vital for determining optimum management. There are a number of ways that samples are obtained. There are - tissue scrapings from body surfaces like the cervix. -Fine needle aspiration: -Needle biopsy : -Incision biopsy : -Excision biopsy to name a few.

Often the specimens are stained and viewed under a microscope. This allows the clinician to determine optimum treatment and to gain prognostic information. These processes are backed up by full clinical examination. Other investigations used are radiographs, ultrasound, isotope scans, CT, MRI, PET scans, aspirates. Naturally the clinician wants to measure the dimensions of the tumour and identify the exact location for potential surgery.

Commonly used are tumour marker assays - these are proteins associated with so called 'malignancy.' A list of some : - Oestrogen receptor and CA15-3 - breast cancer. Carcinoembryonic (CEA) in colorectal. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) - prostate. CA125 in ovarian cancer. CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer. Alpha fetoprotein (AFP). Beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase in testicular teratoma and seminoma. Thyroglobulin in follicular carcinoma of thyroid. Calcitonin in medullary carcinoma of thyroid. S100 in melanoma and neuroendocrine tumours. VMA in phaeochromocytoma (adrenal medulla).

These markers help with diagnosis but aren't always a hundred percent full proof.

The Myth that Chemo Helps.

Chemotherapy was the brainchild of a chap who noticed that mustard gas killed rapidly dividing living cells. Chemo is a cousin of mustard gas. Billions of pounds later there has been very little improvement in survival rates since 1971. Part of the reason for the poor success is that invitro studies are totally different to invivo studies. What there has been is a massaging of statistics.

One of the few studies comparing chemo against another form of treatment tamoxifen - There was no improvement in survival rates compared to when tamoxifen was taken alone (The Lancet, 1996; 347: 1066-71). There is no evidence that it helps any of these cancers - liver , rectal, small cell cancer, colon and bladder. Why is it given, who benefits?

Have They Ever Compared Cancer Patients on Chemo to Those Not on it?

They have never done a study whereby you leave cancer patients alone and compare survival rates with those on chemo. The medical establishment would argue that to give cancer patients no treatment is unethical. This argument relies on the assumption that chemo helps. How do we know that it is the chemo which is responsible for those who survive. They admit they don't know what causes cancer so the reader must surely agree that maybe some other factors might be at play.

A study in published in Natural News 2nd Feb 2009 showed that chemo hastened the death of some people.

Now with the discovery of Meta-Medicine we can start to answer these questions. With the understanding of the two phases of dis-ease we now know that some growths appear in the first phase (conflict active) and others in the second (conflict resolved). When it appears in the second phase the hands and feet will be warm and the appetite good. The reverse is true when the conflict is active. When it comes to growths in the healing phase the last thing you need is chemo as it knocks the patient back into conflict phase as evident by the effects on appetite. Moreover the slowing of the growth is not because of the chemo but because the healing is now interrupted and will have to be resumed at some point. While the conflict is active, like with lung alveoli tumours, chemo speeds up death as it compounds the sympathacatonia i.e. it accelerates the stress innervation.

Metastasis is a Hypothesis!

This cannot be emphasized enough. METASTASIS is an unproven HYPOTHESIS. With the understanding of this new discovery we now have a new perspective. The leading cause of secondaries is the diagnosis and prognostic implications given to patients by their doctor. In other words millions are signing their death warrants by going to their doctor who has no understanding of the connection of the psyche to the organ. There is a saying "The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

"Fear of death" conflict affects the lung. Unfortunately foci appear instantly so by the time the consultant performs a radiograph of the lung he sees a shadow. He claims the original lesion has spread. Sadly it often was the diagnosis of the 'cancer' which triggered the new conflict.

This chap I met told of how this nurse screamed when she spilt chemo on her hand. The matron rushed in to calm her down. They then moved over to inject it into this chap saying that it behaves differently in the bloodstream than on the skin. You can imagine his thoughts at that point.

Oncologists Won't Touch Their Own Poison.

Another cancer patient I met found studies which showed most oncologists wouldn't touch chemo with a barge pole and certainly wouldn't give it to their families. 58 out of 72 wouldn't and she believed that the other 14 said they would to save face. This sort of statement is generally quite well known or at least should be and I encourage the reader to verify it yourself.

In light of what has just been said people have queried this. When oncologists were asked -

"Knowing the odds of successful outcome using chemotherapy are nil in many cancer cases, why do you continue to prescribe chemotherapy?"

The answer he got was this: "We give it to patients so they won't give up hope and fall into the hands of quacks." Who are the quacks you may ask!

It is difficult with the scientific understanding of Meta-Medicine to not be biased. Like we look back to the practices of the 1700's and are appalled, the same will be said by future generations about chemo.

In the meantime the holocaust continues in the name of the fat profits of the pharmaceutical industry. I say holocaust because there is a deliberate suppression of Dr. Hamers discovery. Warrants have been issued for his arrest in Europe and he lives in hiding outside the E.U. not wanting to go back to prison a third time. Ignorance is one thing, deliberate suppression another.

As an example of profits - Researchers from the National Cancer Institute used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Medicare database to examine the costs of initial cancer treatments in 306,709 breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancer patients over the age of 65. Over the ten-year period studied, the average cost of breast cancer treatment increased $4,189 to $20,964. The average cost of treating prostate cancer increased $5,435 to $41,134, while the average cost of lung cancer treatment went up $7,139 to $39,891. (Gutirrez,D 2008). Who pays, us the taxpayer.

Animals have high survival rates and rarely get secondaries. Of course oncologists don't enquire about this, more often they rely on results obtained through the torture of rodents to inform their decisions. They say that formaldehyde is a carcinogen. Formaldehyde doesn't cause cance, it is the conflict the animal suffers from the torture.

What to do?

One of the best things a practitioner can do is free their patients from the insidious, fear ridden consensus field of their illness which unfortunately is what the medical establishment promotes.

Our loved ones are silently slipping away in hospital wards being denied the knowledge of Meta-Medicine and the new approach this entails to their illness. In the words of Dr.Hamer 'the man who invented chemo should be given a monument in hell.'

Jade Goody is the classic example of what not to do. If got early enough sometimes surgery can help.

Remember that the same people who suppress this are the same sorts of people who drop depleted uranium where children live in Iraq and maimed hundreds of thousands in Vietnam with agent orange. Now they give you and your family a derivative of mustard gas and tell you it will help.Their greed knows no limits, they have no scruples and absolutely love to be in control.Consent is created through the manipulation of the mass media. Wake up!

To end this article we leave you with a quote from a French Professor of oncology - Professor George Mathe - "If I contracted cancer, I would never go to a standard cancer treatment center. Cancer patients who live far from centers have a chance."

Gutirrez, D (2008) Natural News ( Cancer Industry Raking in Profits on Chemotherapy as Treatment costs skyrocket)

Time is of the essence when dealing with certain health issues. Visit metamedicine and find out more.

This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.